Re: groff/-mandoc replacement (OT)

To: tech-userlevel%NetBSD.org@localhost
Subject: Re: groff/-mandoc replacement (OT)
From: Joerg Sonnenberger <joerg%britannica.bec.de@localhost>
Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 16:45:25 +0100

On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 10:03:22AM -0400, der Mouse wrote:
> In particular, to someone reading the source, .Pp meaning "I don't want
> a new paragraph but I want a blank line" is indistinguishable from .Pp
> meaning "I want a new paragraph".

You could do that by using .Lp, which is supposed to describe the
former, even though they are currently aliases.

Joerg

Follow-Ups:
- Re: groff/-mandoc replacement (OT)
  - From: der Mouse

References:
- Re: groff/-mandoc replacement (OT)
  - From: Greg A. Woods
- Re: groff/-mandoc replacement (OT)
  - From: Joerg Sonnenberger
- Re: groff/-mandoc replacement (OT)
  - From: der Mouse
- Re: groff/-mandoc replacement (OT)
  - From: Iain Hibbert
- Re: groff/-mandoc replacement (OT)
  - From: Kristaps Džonsons
- Re: groff/-mandoc replacement (OT)
  - From: der Mouse
- Re: groff/-mandoc replacement (OT)
  - From: Iain Hibbert
- Re: groff/-mandoc replacement (OT)
  - From: der Mouse
- Re: groff/-mandoc replacement (OT)
  - From: Alan Barrett
- Re: groff/-mandoc replacement (OT)
  - From: der Mouse

Prev by Date: Re: Status of Citrus libiconv?
Next by Date: Re: Status of Citrus libiconv?
Previous by Thread: Re: groff/-mandoc replacement (OT)
Next by Thread: Re: groff/-mandoc replacement (OT)
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index