Re: "up to date at all costs" is a failed approach

To: nia <nia%NetBSD.org@localhost>
Subject: Re: "up to date at all costs" is a failed approach
From: Greg Troxel <gdt%lexort.com@localhost>
Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2024 09:22:17 -0400

nia <nia%NetBSD.org@localhost> writes:

> Why? Policy, mostly.

More precisely, the NetBSD development model and policy to stop it not
going far enough.

References:
- "up to date at all costs" is a failed approach
  - From: nia
- Re: "up to date at all costs" is a failed approach
  - From: Jonathan Perkin
- Re: "up to date at all costs" is a failed approach
  - From: Rob Whitlock
- Re: "up to date at all costs" is a failed approach
  - From: Jonathan Perkin
- Re: "up to date at all costs" is a failed approach
  - From: nia
- Re: "up to date at all costs" is a failed approach
  - From: nia

Prev by Date: Re: "up to date at all costs" is a failed approach
Next by Date: daily pkgsrc CVS update output
Previous by Thread: Re: "up to date at all costs" is a failed approach
Next by Thread: Re: "up to date at all costs" is a failed approach
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index