tech-pkg archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: MAKE_JOBS.devel/cmake ineffective

A nit: I would think that the PKG_MAKE_JOBS or PKG_BUILD_JOBS variable
would apply equally to the install phase, and might also apply to core
usage in pigz in package creation, and some future parallelization of
wrapper generation and patching.

I see MAKE as sort of a phrase for the interface and that other build
systems are basically implementing that interface.  Given that we have
MAKE_JOBS, I'd just as soon stick with the language.

Overall I did not have any negative reactions to your proposals.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index