Re: MAKE_JOBS.devel/cmake ineffective

[Joerg Sonnenberger <joerg%bec.de@localhost>]

On Wed, Nov 04, 2020 at 12:18:19PM +0000, Jonathan Perkin wrote:
> To me this makes more sense, and is easier to read and understand
> rather than embedding the "-j".  The one difference is that now -j1
> will be explicitly used when MAKE_JOBS_SAFE=no, where previously the
> -j was omitted, but again to me that feels more correct anyway.

At least for bmake it makes a huge difference and not necessarily in the
right direction. -j1 and no -j are quite different modes.

Joerg