Re: spurious/incorrect "gobject-introspection" dependencies?

[Patrick Welche <prlw1%cam.ac.uk@localhost>]

On Sun, Feb 05, 2017 at 04:18:24PM +0100, Martin Husemann wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 05, 2017 at 03:20:39PM +0100, Kamil Rytarowski wrote:
> > Excuse me, I missed bindings.
> 
> Still it is important to keep it optional as it plain breaks the build
> for *many* pkgs - and it is of zero importance to the user if you
> don't use python nor are debugging gnome.

This thread started with py-gobject3, which is precisely for python bindings.

(Proposed build-only dependency is probably correct.)

Cheers,

Patrick