pkgsrc-WIP-discuss archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: New packages and question about BUILDLINK_DEPENDS
- To: Aron Stansvik <elvstone%gmail.com@localhost>
- Subject: Re: New packages and question about BUILDLINK_DEPENDS
- From: Geert Hendrickx <geert.hendrickx%ua.ac.be@localhost>
- Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2005 13:22:02 +0200 See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. Report problems to http://sf.net/tracker/?func=add&group_id=1&atid=200001 1.0 FORGED_RCVD_HELO Received: contains a forged HELO 0.0 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
On Thu, Sep 15, 2005 at 01:18:53PM +0200, Geert Hendrickx wrote:
> > Does this even make sense? Is it horrid? ;) If it is, then I'll go with
> > the libmemcache> hack instead.
>
> I'd say go with libmemcache> or libmemcache>=0 for now (since it's a new
> package, there are no older versions in pkgsrc anyway), and use >=1.4.0
> once it has been released. You don't need the PKGREVISION, since the
> version of the package itself will change also. No changes will be
> required to lighttpd then.
Nah, just do what Thomas suggested. :-)
GH
-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server.
Download it for free - -and be entered to win a 42" plasma tv or your very
own Sony(tm)PSP. Click here to play: http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php
_______________________________________________
pkgsrc-wip-discuss mailing list
pkgsrc-wip-discuss%lists.sourceforge.net@localhost
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pkgsrc-wip-discuss
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index |
Old Index