pkgsrc-WIP-discuss archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: New packages and question about BUILDLINK_DEPENDS
- To: ghen%telenet.be@localhost
- Subject: Re: New packages and question about BUILDLINK_DEPENDS
- From: Aron Stansvik <elvstone%gmail.com@localhost>
- Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2005 11:18:55 +0200 See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. Report problems to http://sf.net/tracker/?func=add&group_id=1&atid=200001 0.0 RCVD_BY_IP Received by mail server with no name -0.0 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
2005/9/15, Aron Stansvik <elvstone%gmail.com@localhost>:
> 2005/9/15, Geert Hendrickx <geert.hendrickx%ua.ac.be@localhost>:
> > On Thu, Sep 15, 2005 at 12:32:09AM +0200, Aron Stansvik wrote:
> > > I'm a little unsure if having the dependency on "1.4.0.b5" instead of
> > > just "1.4.0" will mess up when libmemcache 1.4.0 becomes the final
> > > "1.4.0".
> >
> > I think it will. So use >=1.4.0 if it's necessary, but simply use
> > libmemcache if the version is not that important.
>
> Okay. In that case I think I'll go with just libmemcache. libmemcache
> seems very stable and slow growing, and I'm only adding this package
> because it's an optional dependency of the lighttpd package, so it's
> not like there's a horde of packages waiting to use it. I'll keep an
> eye out though :)
Ehum. Just to make sure I get this right. To make it depend on just
"libmemcache", no specific version, I would just skip the assignment
to BUILDLINK_DEPENDS.libmemcache ?
A buildlink3.mk file like:
BUILDLINK_DEPTH:= ${BUILDLINK_DEPTH}+
LIBMEMCACHE_BUILDLINK3_MK:= ${LIBMEMCACHE_BUILDLINK3_MK}+
.if !empty(BUILDLINK_DEPTH:M+)
BUILDLINK_DEPENDS+= libmemcache
.endif
BUILDLINK_PACKAGES:= ${BUILDLINK_PACKAGES:Nlibmemcache}
BUILDLINK_PACKAGES+= libmemcache
.if !empty(LIBMEMCACHE_BUILDLINK3_MK:M+)
BUILDLINK_PKGSRCDIR.libmemcache?= ../../wip/libmemcache
.endif # LIBMEMCACHE_BUILDLINK3_MK
BUILDLINK_DEPTH:= ${BUILDLINK_DEPTH:S/+$//}
Will pull in the dependency, with no specific version requirement. Right?
Sorry for all the questions, but it's my first package, and I couldn't
find any information in the pkgsrc docs about non-version-sensitive
buildlink3.mk files. And digging in /usr/pkgsrc/mk is mostly voodo to
me :)
Aron
-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server.
Download it for free - -and be entered to win a 42" plasma tv or your very
own Sony(tm)PSP. Click here to play: http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php
_______________________________________________
pkgsrc-wip-discuss mailing list
pkgsrc-wip-discuss%lists.sourceforge.net@localhost
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pkgsrc-wip-discuss
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index |
Old Index