Re: radeon(hd?) on Thinkpad T60p (again)

[Sujit K M <sjt.kar%gmail.com@localhost>]

On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 9:06 PM, Moritz Wilhelmy 
<mw+netbsd%barfooze.de@localhost> wrote:
> Hello Sujit,
>
> On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 20:19:42 +0530, Sujit K M wrote:
>> On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 6:16 PM, Moritz Wilhelmy 
>> <mw+netbsd%barfooze.de@localhost> wrote:
>> > Hello,
>> >
>> > I'm currently running into issues with NetBSD on my T60p.
>> > The solutions proposed here don't seem to work:
>> > http://mail-index.netbsd.org/tech-x11/2012/04/17/msg001117.html
>> >
>> >  * radeonhd driver results in some glitches and then a blackscreen
>> >  * adding "userconf disable radeondrm" to /boot.cfg doesn't help, X11
>> >    is glitchy.
>> >
>> > I'm running -current/6.99.30.
>> > My GPU seems to be (from dmesg)
>> > radeondrm0 at vga1: ATI Mobility FireGL V5200
>> > radeondrm0: Initialized radeon 1.29.0 20080613
>> >
>> > which is interesting, given that I disabled radeondrm in boot.cfg...?
>> >
>> > Xorg.0.log with radeonhd contains binary garbage.
>>
>> This should help. http://www.netbsd.org/docs/guide/en/chap-x.html
>
> Which paragraph exactly?

It is manual so better read it through out

>
>> I find(might be I am wrong) from you dmesg and Xorg.log that a lot
>> of configuration is wrong.
>
> I started Xorg without a configuration file, except for radeonhd, where
> I only enforced the driver in the configuration file via
>
> Section "Device"
>         Identifier "card0"
>         Driver "radeonhd"
> EndSection
>
snip<...>

> Would you please elaborate what you think is wrong about my Xorg.0.log
> and dmesg? Both looked fairly normal to me, also with regard to which
> drivers attach to which devices.

Dmesg below

wsdisplay0: screen 1 added (80x25, vt100 emulation)
wsdisplay0: screen 2 added (80x25, vt100 emulation)
wsdisplay0: screen 3 added (80x25, vt100 emulation)
wsdisplay0: screen 4 added (80x25, vt100 emulation)

I find 4 screens are added.

So went and checked the Xorg.log
Found section [   391.035] to have been suspect.


>
> By the way, is the correct list to discuss this issue netbsd-users@?
> (However this is where the 2012 email went to, too).