Re: libquota proposal

[Manuel Bouyer <bouyer%antioche.eu.org@localhost>]

On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 03:45:45AM +0000, David Holland wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 03:21:22PM +0100, Manuel Bouyer wrote:
>  > > That's a bug, or more accurately legacy behavior that doesn't need to
>  > > be supported.
>  > 
>  > of course it's not nice. But we're talking about existing code calling the
>  > legacy quotactl. If we're going to change it to not check the fstab
>  > options any more, we may as well change it to use libquota.
> 
> I don't understand - surely edquota and repquota go through your
> proplib interface now?

We were talking about code like netatalk, which is why I propose
a public library for this.

-- 
Manuel Bouyer <bouyer%antioche.eu.org@localhost>
     NetBSD: 26 ans d'experience feront toujours la difference
--