Re: libquota proposal

[Manuel Bouyer <bouyer%antioche.eu.org@localhost>]

On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 05:14:10PM +0000, David Holland wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 05:45:38PM +0100, Manuel Bouyer wrote:
>  > > Everywhere? If "quota2" is going to be the standard quota and the old one
>  > > is going to be deprecated, then it is better to call it "quota" and 
> rename
>  > > the old one.
>  > 
>  > At this point, in the source 'quota1' is used for the old
>  > quota format, 'quota2' for the new one and 'quota' for the few things
>  > that are common.
> 
> Everything outside the kernel should be in the last category, though.

exept those that deal directly with the filesystem datas (edquota,
quotacheck, repquota for quota1, newfs, fsck_ffs, tunefs and fsdb for
quota2).

For others, that's fine with me

-- 
Manuel Bouyer <bouyer%antioche.eu.org@localhost>
     NetBSD: 26 ans d'experience feront toujours la difference
--