[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: libquota proposal
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 02:21:26PM +0100, Manuel Bouyer wrote:
> > (also, edquota and repquota seem fs-independent to me...)
> no, they're not: they can directly the quota1 file specified in the
> fstab if quotactl fails or the filesystem is not mounted.
That's a bug, or more accurately legacy behavior that doesn't need to
be supported. Once upon a time (IIRC) df used to fall back to opening
the block device and examining ffs structures directly; that was
removed because it violated desirable abstractions.
David A. Holland
Main Index |
Thread Index |