Re: libquota proposal

[Manuel Bouyer <bouyer%antioche.eu.org@localhost>]

On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 11:35:15AM -0400, Christos Zoulas wrote:
> On Mar 19, 12:24pm, bouyer%antioche.eu.org@localhost (Manuel Bouyer) wrote:
> -- Subject: Re: libquota proposal
> 
> | On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 12:14:38AM +0000, Christos Zoulas wrote:
> | > >is there absolutely no chance for old code to work with the new
> | > >kernel?  if it's simply making it use the old quotactl() calls,
> | > >then please reconsider renaming the new syscall to something
> | > >else, as discussed on the prior thread.
> | > 
> | > And can we s/quota2/quota/ and s/quota/quota1 or oquota.
> | 
> | where ? header, sources, documentation, ... ?
> 
> Everywhere? If "quota2" is going to be the standard quota and the old one
> is going to be deprecated, then it is better to call it "quota" and rename
> the old one.

At this point, in the source 'quota1' is used for the old
quota format, 'quota2' for the new one and 'quota' for the few things
that are common.

-- 
Manuel Bouyer <bouyer%antioche.eu.org@localhost>
     NetBSD: 26 ans d'experience feront toujours la difference
--