Re: libquota proposal

[David Holland <dholland-tech%netbsd.org@localhost>]

On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 03:21:22PM +0100, Manuel Bouyer wrote:
 > > That's a bug, or more accurately legacy behavior that doesn't need to
 > > be supported.
 > 
 > of course it's not nice. But we're talking about existing code calling the
 > legacy quotactl. If we're going to change it to not check the fstab
 > options any more, we may as well change it to use libquota.

I don't understand - surely edquota and repquota go through your
proplib interface now?

-- 
David A. Holland
dholland%netbsd.org@localhost