tech-pkg archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: annotated bulk failures, pre-2011Q4 edition
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 01:24:55PM +0400, Aleksej Saushev wrote:
> > > Are you using amd64?
> >
> > Yes. So is Joerg's build; it's the data we have available. If someone
> > wants to do i386 builds of pkgsrc HEAD too, go for it.
>
> I'm not sure about it, I'll try to figure it out, but I'm afraid that
> I don't have time for it before after the release.
Well... we've got what we've got, more data would be useful but
there's plenty to do as it is.
> > > > math/openaxiom lisp issues
> > >
> > > This just works, lift your time limit.
> >
> > No, it doesn't.
> >
> > "error: Lisp code contained errors"
> >
> > http://ftp.netbsd.org/pub/pkgsrc/misc/joerg/20111214.1415/openaxiom-1.3.0/build.log
>
> This time it is different. And it is weird: compile-file indicates failure,
> but compiler itself doesn't list any errors when writing FASL.
> I have implemented workaround. Should be fixed now.
This is PR 44739, btw.
> > > > parallel/openmpi extra stuff installed
> > >
> > > I need more details.
> >
> > http://ftp.netbsd.org/pub/pkgsrc/misc/joerg/20111214.1415/openmpi-1.5.4nb1/install.log
>
> I'll look at it.
Thanks.
> > > > parallel/sge SIGSEGV during build (***)
> > >
> > > amd64?
> >
> > Yes.
>
> I think that it should be marked i386-only or built against 32-bit
> compatibility libraries.
Do we have a standard way of doing the latter yet?
> > > > shells/scsh SIGSEGV during build (***)
> > >
> > > amd64?
> >
> > Yes. It also apparently SIGSEGVs on amd64 Linux, for whatever that's
> > worth.
>
> This is known to be broken on amd64.
Then we should probably just mark it NOT_FOR_PLATFORM. Do you have an
upstream reference?
--
David A. Holland
dholland%netbsd.org@localhost
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index |
Old Index