tech-pkg archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: annotated bulk failures, pre-2011Q4 edition
David Holland <dholland-pkgtech%netbsd.org@localhost> writes:
> On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 10:11:13PM +0400, Aleksej Saushev wrote:
> > > lang/polyml unclear on whether it's doing i386 vs. amd64
> (***)
> >
> > Are you using amd64?
>
> Yes. So is Joerg's build; it's the data we have available. If someone
> wants to do i386 builds of pkgsrc HEAD too, go for it.
I'm not sure about it, I'll try to figure it out, but I'm afraid that
I don't have time for it before after the release.
> > > math/openaxiom lisp issues
> >
> > This just works, lift your time limit.
>
> No, it doesn't.
>
> "error: Lisp code contained errors"
>
> http://ftp.netbsd.org/pub/pkgsrc/misc/joerg/20111214.1415/openaxiom-1.3.0/build.log
This time it is different. And it is weird: compile-file indicates failure,
but compiler itself doesn't list any errors when writing FASL.
I have implemented workaround. Should be fixed now.
> > > parallel/openmpi extra stuff installed
> >
> > I need more details.
>
> http://ftp.netbsd.org/pub/pkgsrc/misc/joerg/20111214.1415/openmpi-1.5.4nb1/install.log
I'll look at it.
> > > parallel/sge SIGSEGV during build (***)
> >
> > amd64?
>
> Yes.
I think that it should be marked i386-only or built against 32-bit
compatibility libraries.
> > > shells/scsh SIGSEGV during build (***)
> >
> > amd64?
>
> Yes. It also apparently SIGSEGVs on amd64 Linux, for whatever that's
> worth.
This is known to be broken on amd64.
--
HE CE3OH...
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index |
Old Index