tech-pkg archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: annotated bulk failures, pre-2011Q4 edition



David Holland <dholland-pkgtech%netbsd.org@localhost> writes:

> On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 10:11:13PM +0400, Aleksej Saushev wrote:
>  > > lang/polyml              unclear on whether it's doing i386 vs. amd64 
> (***)
>  > 
>  > Are you using amd64?
>
> Yes. So is Joerg's build; it's the data we have available. If someone
> wants to do i386 builds of pkgsrc HEAD too, go for it.

I'm not sure about it, I'll try to figure it out, but I'm afraid that
I don't have time for it before after the release.

>  > > math/openaxiom           lisp issues
>  > 
>  > This just works, lift your time limit.
>
> No, it doesn't.
>
> "error: Lisp code contained errors"
>
> http://ftp.netbsd.org/pub/pkgsrc/misc/joerg/20111214.1415/openaxiom-1.3.0/build.log

This time it is different. And it is weird: compile-file indicates failure,
but compiler itself doesn't list any errors when writing FASL.
I have implemented workaround. Should be fixed now.

>  > > parallel/openmpi extra stuff installed
>  > 
>  > I need more details.
>
> http://ftp.netbsd.org/pub/pkgsrc/misc/joerg/20111214.1415/openmpi-1.5.4nb1/install.log

I'll look at it.

>  > > parallel/sge             SIGSEGV during build (***)
>  > 
>  > amd64?
>
> Yes.

I think that it should be marked i386-only or built against 32-bit
compatibility libraries.

>  > > shells/scsh              SIGSEGV during build (***)
>  > 
>  > amd64?
>
> Yes. It also apparently SIGSEGVs on amd64 Linux, for whatever that's
> worth.

This is known to be broken on amd64.


-- 
HE CE3OH...



Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index