Re: selectively disabling atime updates?

[Ignatios Souvatzis <is%netbsd.org@localhost>]

On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 08:37:06AM -0700, Paul Goyette wrote:
> On Thu, 31 May 2012, Matthias Kretschmer wrote:
> 
> >On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 04:42:27PM +0200, Edgar Fuß wrote:
> >>>How about using fss for it instead.
> >>1. fss is still marked experimental.
> >oh, I have overlooked that.
> >
> >>2. does fss work with WAPL at all?
> >I don't know that.
> 
> It seems to work for me!  All my FS are WAPBL-enabled, and I always
> use backup -X for snapshot.

rsync from a snapshot wouldn't work for me on sparc-64 with an
oldish kernel (5.99.something). I must setup one of the slower
machines for at least partial tests, because the main one is
the file server...

Paul, what's your architecture and version?

        -is
-- 
seal your e-mail: http://www.gnupg.org/