Re: selectively disabling atime updates?

[David Holland <dholland-tech%netbsd.org@localhost>]

On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 04:56:26PM +0200, Matthias Kretschmer wrote:
 > > > How about using fss for it instead.
 > > 1. fss is still marked experimental.
 > oh, I have overlooked that.

I'm not sure that should stop you though. Or the marking should be
removed. People use it, it seems to work, it's been a while since
anyone's reported problems that I've noticed.

 > > 2. does fss work with WAPL at all?
 > I don't know that.

It's expected to at this point. (In -6 and -current, but IIRC not in -5.)

-- 
David A. Holland
dholland%netbsd.org@localhost