Re: selectively disabling atime updates?

[Matthias Kretschmer <kretschm%cs.uni-bonn.de@localhost>]

On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 04:42:27PM +0200, Edgar Fuß wrote:
> > How about using fss for it instead.
> 1. fss is still marked experimental.
oh, I have overlooked that.

> 2. does fss work with WAPL at all?
I don't know that.

Another idea is, if lvm is considered stable, to create a low-level
snapshot via lvm after a sync (without an unmount) and then mountig the
snapshot and hoping that WAPL handles the situation nicely.  Backup from
the snapshot, then destroy the lvm-snapshot.

--
Matthias