Re: print/ghostscript - "cups" option shouldn't be default?

[Benny Siegert <bsiegert%gmail.com@localhost>]

On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 15:54, D'Arcy J.M. Cain <darcy%netbsd.org@localhost> 
wrote:
> On Fri, 20 May 2011 09:19:09 -0400
> Greg Troxel <gdt%ir.bbn.com@localhost> wrote:
>> I think the problem is that ghsotcript, when compiled with cups support,
>> not only has a few extra programs, which would be fine, but depends on
>> cups.
>
> Is it a real dependency?  Perhaps we can simply remove the DEPENDS from
> ghostscript, enable cups support and simply make cups depend on
> ghostscript.

No, it is a real dependency. It compiles the pstoraster binary for use
with CUPS, which links against libcups and libcupsimage.

--Benny.