pkgsrc-Users archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: print/ghostscript - "cups" option shouldn't be default?

To: pkgsrc-users%netbsd.org@localhost
Subject: Re: print/ghostscript - "cups" option shouldn't be default?
From: Joerg Sonnenberger <joerg%britannica.bec.de@localhost>
Date: Fri, 20 May 2011 23:12:23 +0200

On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 05:56:09PM -0300, Silas Silva wrote:
> There was print/ghostscript-esp, but it was merged into
> print/ghostscript, right?  It is more difficult that I thought.  What
> would be a good solution?  Let it as it is?

Split off libcups from cups.

Joerg

References:
- print/ghostscript - "cups" option shouldn't be default?
  - From: Silas Silva
- Re: print/ghostscript - "cups" option shouldn't be default?
  - From: Greg Troxel
- Re: print/ghostscript - "cups" option shouldn't be default?
  - From: D'Arcy J.M. Cain
- Re: print/ghostscript - "cups" option shouldn't be default?
  - From: Silas Silva

Prev by Date: Re: print/ghostscript - "cups" option shouldn't be default?
Next by Date: Re: print/ghostscript - "cups" option shouldn't be default?
Previous by Thread: Re: print/ghostscript - "cups" option shouldn't be default?
Next by Thread: Re: print/ghostscript - "cups" option shouldn't be default?
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index