On 6/7/2012 00:05, Thomas Klausner wrote:
On Wed, Jun 06, 2012 at 11:57:48PM +0200, John Marino wrote:I don't think this policy is a good idea. Patches have revisions, and you don't (normally) revise a patch with an editor. You regenerate it with pkgdiff, and when that happens the previous comment is lost.AFAIK that's incorrect. pkgdiff keeps comments. In case it doesn't, that's a bug. Have you seen this happening? Thomas
I must be using it wrong, although I don't know how pkgdiff is can retain the comment.
Basically: 1) apply patch, which results in patched file and .orig file 2) change patched file as desired 3) use pkgdiff with updated patched file and .orig fileI don't see where pkgdiff gets the access to the original comment to pass to stdout this way.
John