Re: skirmishing w/ emulation

[Eric Haszlakiewicz <erh%nimenees.com@localhost>]

On July 19, 2015 10:46:59 AM EDT, "William A. Mahaffey III" <wam%hiwaay.net@localhost> wrote:
>On 07/19/15 09:40, William A. Mahaffey III wrote:
>> need the suse-10, rather than 12, unless suse-12 is backwards 
>> compatible w/ suse-10, would you have any info on that ?

Sorry, no idea.

>about putting an entry in my fstab file mounting procfs as 
>/emul/linux/proc. I already have a procfs in my fstab file for NetBSD,
>I 
>presume. Did it mean an entry in /emul/linux/etc/fstab ? If so, the 
>message out of the install process is off-base. Please advise & have a 
>good one.

No, that really does mean /etc/fstab.  The one under /emul/linux won't actually cause anything to be mounted, but many linux programs need a (linux compatible) /proc available so you need to arrange for the normal NetBSD mounts that happen at boot to include that.

Eric