Re: Unified BSD?

[Hub- FreeBSD <freebsd%hub.org@localhost>]

On 2012-11-16, at 6:42 AM, Erich Dollansky 
<erichfreebsdlist%alogreentechnologies.com@localhost> wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> On Fri, 16 Nov 2012 14:52:48 +0100
> Johnny Billquist <bqt%update.uu.se@localhost> wrote:
> 
>> On 2012-11-16 12:48, Tomas Bodzar wrote:
>>> On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 9:34 AM, Hub- FreeBSD <freebsd%hub.org@localhost>
>>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> Actually, according to what we are tracking at
>>>> http://bsdstats.org, there are currently *8*:
>>>> 
>>>> PC-BSD
>>>> FreeBSD
>>>> PYC-BSD (aka Rus-BSD)
>>>> DesktopBSD
>>>> OpenBSD
>>>> NetBSD
>>>> DragonflyBSD
>>>> MidnightBSD
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> Tracking something like DesktopBSD which doesn't exist for quite a
>>> long time make statistics not much useful. MidnightBSD seems to be
>>> same case as last activy on mailing list last year in May, forums
>>> doesn't working at all so we are still on 4 core BSDs
>>> (Open/Net/Free/Dfly).
>> 
>> I find it rather meaningless as a tracking tool for BSD in general. 
>> There is no way something like 2BSD would ever appear there, no
>> matter how many systems were installed.
> 
> the number of FreeBSD installations for Indonesia seem also very, very
> low. We would have 20% of the installation base then.

Its a purely opt-in system, excepf for PC-BSD, which has theirs as an opt-out 
when you install the OS … that is why its numbers are so much higher then 
everyone else …