On Tue, Nov 13, 2012, at 14:18, Martin wrote:
> My point is about the possibility of creating a new BSD project (with
> separate developers) that aims for 100% compatibility with at least
> FreeBSD, NetBSD, OpenBSD and maybe DragonflyBSD.
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012, at 22:43, matthew sporleder wrote:Not a developer, but here's something I've been thinking about: Are
> If you are interested in generating linux-like "buzz" advocate
> hardware manufacturers and industry types to fund (with money)
> development of drivers.
there perhaps some *parts* of the major BSDs (kernel interfaces, file
formats) that could benefit from being unified / standardized? Maybe at
least a subset of syscalls and libraries that could be agreed on and
declared stable forever so that simple binaries can run? That is
something that's already being done for Linux compatibility - except for
the bit about stability. But why should I have to keep Linux binaries
around for handling weird archive formats?
I think matthew is basically right; but if there was only one single
target to develop for, with a big fat sign on it saying simply "BSD",
I'd bet that arguing for getting things written - graphics drivers or
userland tools for managing ones RAID setup, or whatever would end up
being feasible - would be easier.
In my daydreams (slightly less unrealistic than the mail that started
the discussion) I'm sending an email to a developer that says "Hey, you
can get four done in one shot, and it's also a standard. And did I
mention that Apple and the Minix project have been using lots of code
from the BSD projects? Want to bet they'll adopt this too?".
Yeah, I need to get out more, but you get the point.