Re: Do you advise me to adopt NetBSD?

[vitsen%gmx.com@localhost]

On 2012-10-11 12:00, Thomas Mueller wrote:> from vitsen%gmx.com@localhost:

> I've had a rough time with NetBSD, worse on the new computer (Intel 
Sandy Bridge)
> than the old.  FreeBSD worked better.  You might want to try NetBSD 
or FreeBSD
> to see how it works, but don't burn your bridges on Linux.
>
> I would say NetBSD is more minimalistic than FreeBSD; FreeBSD seems more
> forward-looking, and stabler.

The impression that I got (which may as well be wrong) is that FreeBSD 
is more mass-oriented than Net-/OpenBSD, although not as much as PC-BSD, 
of course. Next to PC-BSD, FreeBSD is probably the more Linux-like of 
BSD distributions. And that is precisely the reason why it does not 
attract me.