[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: RAIDframe guide too complicated
On Sun, 19 Feb 2012 18:25:50 +0000
Matthias Scheler <tron%zhadum.org.uk@localhost> wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 10:24:25AM -0800, Jeff Rizzo wrote:
> > >1.) Removing the part about setting a non-RAIDed swap partition for
> > > kernel crash dumps. That hasn't been necessary since NetBSD
> > > 5.0 and is highly error prone.
> I still want to make this change.
I'm certainly fine with this, and anything else that improves
documentation... (though I can't claim authorship of the RAIDframe bits
in the guide...)
> > >2.) I would like to suggest a setup with a single RAIDframe volume
> > > where the root and swap partition are simply sub partitions of
> > > e.g. "raid0". I'm using such a setup for years. It works
> > > well and is easy to configure
> I just realized that I misread the document. It already suggest to use
> a single RAID volume.
> > That sounds good to me. Another thing which would be really helpful
> > is being able to set up raidframe in sysinst...
> Yes, indeed.
Main Index |
Thread Index |