[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: softdep : why not the default
> Up until then softdeps was needed for the speed but ffs with or
> without softdeps usually meant a long delay to fsck after any
> unclean shutdown.
FFS w/ softdeps allows background fsck (after going multiuser).
Works fine on FreeBSD. NetBSD needs to add background fsck.
> ``[---] I believe that's simply because the softdep code is difficult
> and time consuming to maintain. Some of the bugs that I know of are
> easy to reproduce and particularly difficult to fix.''
Why is this a problem for NetBSD but not for FreeBSD?
Main Index |
Thread Index |