[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: state or future of LFS?
On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 03:19:29PM -0400, Miles Nordin wrote:
> >>>>> "re" == Robert Elz <kre%munnari.OZ.AU@localhost> writes:
> re> might have been if we were talking about adding LFS to NetBSD,
> re> but that was done years ago, the question now is whether to
> re> remove it, not whether to add it.
> since it's broken, it's really whether to keep it, remove it, or leave
> it in but broken.
Please stop. I assure you, nobody who is actually likely to make any
of the decisions you describe above is still listening. This "discussion"
is just flooding netbsd-users with noise.
Main Index |
Thread Index |