Re: state or future of LFS?

[Thor Lancelot Simon <tls%rek.tjls.com@localhost>]

On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 03:19:29PM -0400, Miles Nordin wrote:
> >>>>> "re" == Robert Elz <kre%munnari.OZ.AU@localhost> writes:
> 
>     re> might have been if we were talking about adding LFS to NetBSD,
>     re> but that was done years ago, the question now is whether to
>     re> remove it, not whether to add it.
> 
> since it's broken, it's really whether to keep it, remove it, or leave
> it in but broken.  

Please stop.  I assure you, nobody who is actually likely to make any
of the decisions you describe above is still listening.  This "discussion"
is just flooding netbsd-users with noise.

Thor