[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: state or future of LFS?
On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 09:06:14PM +0000, Andrew Doran wrote:
> Looking at the bigger picture, the NetBSD project would be better served by
> euthanizing LFS
Are you planning to unilaterally remove it too?
> and bringing in a similar technology with a known working
> and maintained implementation, such as ZFS or HAMMER.
Neither ZFS nor Hammer is a log-structured file system. Or at least,
as far as I know ZFS isn't; Hammer's design seems to keep changing.
I think the important structural question going forward is whether we
should continue to pretend that it works to have lfs and ffs share the
David A. Holland
Main Index |
Thread Index |