[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: rump vs. smbfs
On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 10:44:15PM -0500, James K. Lowden wrote:
> Andrew Reilly wrote:
> > I've been using
> > smbclient as part of a backup script for years. Works fine and
> > reliably, if you're just putting a dump or tar file on a remote
> > server.
> I'm surprised to hear that. The last time I looked at the smbclient
> sources was some years ago. At the time there was *no* error checking.
> It was strictly a toy; a copy could fail and the exit code would indicate
> success. Has that changed?
No, it still doesn't seem to set the return code properly. But it seems
to transfer data properly.
I've tried "mount_smbfs" which worked fine. But I got "invalid argument"
when I tried to "ls -l" on the mount SMB share which seems to be an
old problem, please look here:
Matthias Scheler http://zhadum.org.uk/
Main Index |
Thread Index |