[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: rump vs. smbfs
On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 07:10:49PM +0000, Matthias Scheler wrote:
> On 27 Jan 2009, at 11:11, Andrew Reilly wrote:
> That is what I want as well. But as the remote server is
> a dump NAS device I also want to handle the deletion of
> old dumps remotely. And that seems to be quite tricky
> via "smbclient".
You can do all of that sort of thing through smbclient. In
my backup script I define a helper function to wrap smbclient,
that uses the -c flag to pass in commands and -D to specify an
initial working directory. Then I can script "ls" and "rm" and
"put" commands just as you would expect, without having to
specify the share path and workgroup over and over again.
Main Index |
Thread Index |