Re: amd64 boot broken

To: matthew green <mrg%eterna.com.au@localhost>
Subject: Re: amd64 boot broken
From: Hauke Fath <hauke%Espresso.Rhein-Neckar.DE@localhost>
Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2011 22:24:02 +0200

At 5:56 Uhr +1000 23.8.2011, matthew green wrote:
>> IMO, the switch to gcc 4.5 ought to be reverted on both x86_64 and
>> sparc.

Is that sparc, or sparc64?

FWIW, my ss20 (2x SM71) is keeping up nicely with a gcc 4.5 built
installation, crunching away on pkg_rolling-replace(8). Nothing has popped
up since the update that I wouldn't expect from a HEAD build. The perl5
upgrade has been way more invasive...

        hauke

--
"It's never straight up and down"     (DEVO)

Follow-Ups:
- Re: amd64 boot broken
  - From: Martin Husemann

References:
- Re: amd64 boot broken (was: Re: sys_select() issue? (Was:Re: Sysinst behavior change? (amd64) ))
  - From: Andreas Gustafsson
- re: amd64 boot broken (was: Re: sys_select() issue? (Was:Re: Sysinst behavior change? (amd64) ))
  - From: matthew green

Prev by Date: Re: cannot compile packages (2011Q2,current)
Next by Date: Re: amd64 boot broken
Previous by Thread: re: amd64 boot broken (was: Re: sys_select() issue? (Was:Re: Sysinst behavior change? (amd64) ))
Next by Thread: Re: amd64 boot broken
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index