Re: assertion "anon->an_swslot == 0" failed

[Mindaugas Rasiukevicius <rmind%netbsd.org@localhost>]

yamt%mwd.biglobe.ne.jp@localhost (YAMAMOTO Takashi) wrote:
> >> the later part of uvm_anon_dispose should be done for uvm_anon_release.
> >> i have a fix in my tree testing.
> > 
> > http://www.netbsd.org/~rmind/uvm_anon_release_fix.diff
> > 
> > How about this?
> 
> it's similar to what i'm testing, yes.
> 

Thanks for the fixes!

-- 
Mindaugas