Current-Users archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
psrset(8) issue
The man page for psrset(8) is rather silent on what the behaviour of
psrset set_id
should be (in the absence of any other switches). Since the default
behaviour is for
psrset
to list _all_ processor sets and the member CPUs, it would seem to make
sense that
psrset set_id
would list only a single set and its members. However, the actual
behavior is to ignore the set_id argument and list all sets:
{169} psrset -c 4
{170} psrset
system processor set 0: processor(s) 0 1 2 3 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23
user processor set 1: processor(s) 4
{171} psrset 4
system processor set 0: processor(s) 0 1 2 3 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23
user processor set 1: processor(s) 4
{172}
Is it really the intended behaviour to ignore the set-id argument?
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Paul Goyette | PGP Key fingerprint: | E-mail addresses: |
| Customer Service | FA29 0E3B 35AF E8AE 6651 | paul at whooppee.com |
| Network Engineer | 0786 F758 55DE 53BA 7731 | pgoyette at juniper.net |
| Kernel Developer | | pgoyette at netbsd.org |
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index |
Old Index