Current-Users archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: G'damn raidframe... (was: RaidFrame with unequal size replacements)



On Sun, Aug 02, 2009 at 12:40:32AM -0400, Chris Ross wrote:
> [...]
> 
>   At the moment, I'd reenabled autoconf (root) to bring the system  
> up, added the new disk as a hot spare, and done a rebuild onto it by  
> failing the magic "component1" component.  I now have:
> 
> Components:
>            /dev/sd0a: optimal
>           component1: spared
> Spares:
>            /dev/sd1a: used_spare
> 
> 
>   Which is as described in the documentation.  The statement there  
> was that just rebooting at this point would cause everything to whack  
> back into place, with the two actual disks in the array as compoents,  
> and no spares.

that's always how I did it, and it always worked for me.

-- 
Manuel Bouyer <bouyer%antioche.eu.org@localhost>
     NetBSD: 26 ans d'experience feront toujours la difference
--


Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index