Current-Users archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: G'damn raidframe... (was: RaidFrame with unequal size replacements)
On Sun, Aug 02, 2009 at 12:40:32AM -0400, Chris Ross wrote:
> [...]
>
> At the moment, I'd reenabled autoconf (root) to bring the system
> up, added the new disk as a hot spare, and done a rebuild onto it by
> failing the magic "component1" component. I now have:
>
> Components:
> /dev/sd0a: optimal
> component1: spared
> Spares:
> /dev/sd1a: used_spare
>
>
> Which is as described in the documentation. The statement there
> was that just rebooting at this point would cause everything to whack
> back into place, with the two actual disks in the array as compoents,
> and no spares.
that's always how I did it, and it always worked for me.
--
Manuel Bouyer <bouyer%antioche.eu.org@localhost>
NetBSD: 26 ans d'experience feront toujours la difference
--
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index |
Old Index