[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: G'damn raidframe... (was: RaidFrame with unequal size replacements)
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 11:40:55PM -0400, Chris Ross wrote:
> Sorry to blather to the lists again, but I've once again been
> disappointed, in my opinion, by section 16 of the NetBSD users guide.
> I've long held that there's too much antique documentation in there,
> and while there are many notations about things 5.0 and beyond,
> they're very subscripted.
> But, to my problem. I followed earlier advice and rebuilt onto a
> new raid array. I then rebooted from a CD without autoconfiguration
> set on the array(s), and reconfigured the new array as raid0. Then, I
> followed the advice of the documentation, and:
> # raidctl -v -a /dev/wd0a raid0
> # raidctl -F component0 raid0
> After many hours, this completed. Then, I followed the instruction:
> >And finally, reboot the machine one last time before proceeding.
> >This is required to migrate Disk0/wd0 from status "used_spare" as
> >"Component0" to state "optimal". Refer to notes in the next section
> >regarding verification of clean parity after each reboot.
> Unfortunately, when the machine rebooted, I now have a failed
> "component1", and no mention of the sd1a that I rebuilt onto as a
> spare as per the documentation.
> Anyone have any idea (1) What I did wrong,
I think you forgot to
raidctl -A yes raid0
> or (2) what I need to do
> to reconfigure the raid array so that my drive is the secondary,
> rather than the immaginary drive I used when constructing the raid?
You can try fixing your /etc/raid0.conf with the right devices names.
Manuel Bouyer <bouyer%antioche.eu.org@localhost>
NetBSD: 26 ans d'experience feront toujours la difference
Main Index |
Thread Index |