Re: -current vs raidframe?

[Juergen Hannken-Illjes <hannken%eis.cs.tu-bs.de@localhost>]

On Thu, Jul 02, 2009 at 09:48:13AM +1000, Malcolm Herbert wrote:
> I've built a -current GENERIC kernel from sources dated last night and
> tried to boot it on my Asus Eee 1000H. I have set up the laptop to boot
> from a broken RAID1 mirror, however the new kernel doesn't seem to want
> to touch it.  A stock NetBSD 5.0 GENERIC kernel that the box was built 
> with boots from the same disk without any problems ...
> 
> |Kernelized RAIDframe activated
> |pad0: outputs: 44100Hz, 16-bit, stereo
> |audio1 at pad0: half duplex
> |raid0: RAID Level 1
> |raid0: Components: /dev/wd0a component1[**FAILED**]
> |raid0: Total Sectors: 312581632 (152627 MB)
> |boot device: raid0
> |root on raid0a dumps on raid0b
> |no filesystem for raid0 (dev 0x1200)
> |cannot mount root, error = 79
> |root device (default raid0a):
> 
> ... is there something I need to do to my RAID disks before attempting to 
> boot -current, or is there an option I need to flip in the kernel config
> to get the previous behaviour?

Looks like missing modules.
Did you install -current kernel AND -current modules?
Are your bootblocks up-to-date?

-- 
Juergen Hannken-Illjes - hannken%eis.cs.tu-bs.de@localhost - TU Braunschweig 
(Germany)