[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: dspam problem
On 30/04/2009 13:01, Martti Kuparinen wrote:
> Martti Kuparinen wrote:
>> _hash_drv_seek (N is random, small number) because hash_rec_max
>> becomes zero and at the same time "header" changes to something else
>> than it was previously.
>> fpos = sizeof(struct _hash_drv_header) +
>> ((hashcode % header->hash_rec_max) * sizeof(struct
> Someone else has had same problems...
I know this doesn't *help* you but wasn't the hash driver depreciated ?
Main Index |
Thread Index |