Re: why NetBSD include binary/blob driver or firmware by default?

To: Manuel Bouyer <bouyer%antioche.eu.org@localhost>
Subject: Re: why NetBSD include binary/blob driver or firmware by default?
From: Martin Husemann <martin%duskware.de@localhost>
Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 16:39:15 +0100

On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 04:22:59PM +0100, Manuel Bouyer wrote:
> I'm not sure we have other binary-only drivers than ath

AFAICT we don't - and the ath one is gone from -current already.

Martin

References:
- why NetBSD include binary/blob driver or firmware by default?
  - From: Cem Kayali
- Re: why NetBSD include binary/blob driver or firmware by default?
  - From: Manuel Bouyer
- Re: why NetBSD include binary/blob driver or firmware by default?
  - From: Cem Kayali
- Re: why NetBSD include binary/blob driver or firmware by default?
  - From: Manuel Bouyer
- Re: why NetBSD include binary/blob driver or firmware by default?
  - From: Cem Kayali
- Re: why NetBSD include binary/blob driver or firmware by default?
  - From: Manuel Bouyer

Prev by Date: Re: Accounting data time_t fallout?
Next by Date: Re: i386 and the COMPAT_50 option
Previous by Thread: Re: why NetBSD include binary/blob driver or firmware by default?
Next by Thread: Re: why NetBSD include binary/blob driver or firmware by default?
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index