[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: WAPBL patch for testing
> On Sat, Nov 01, 2008 at 02:19:54AM +0100, Havard Eidnes wrote:
> > The wallcklock difference is quite a lot smaller than previously,
> > but the number of I/Os is still many times larger in the first
> > case, even if you add the two.
> There is still an open question of how aggressive the flushing works,
> which needs to be revisited later. It will likely explain the issues
> with the additional IO.
BTW, both the two latest runs were done with SimonB's patch and
vfs.wapbl.flush_disk_cache = 0
Main Index |
Thread Index |