Re: WAPBL patch for testing

[Joerg Sonnenberger <joerg%britannica.bec.de@localhost>]

On Sat, Nov 01, 2008 at 02:19:54AM +0100, Havard Eidnes wrote:
> The wallcklock difference is quite a lot smaller than previously,
> but the number of I/Os is still many times larger in the first
> case, even if you add the two.

There is still an open question of how aggressive the flushing works,
which needs to be revisited later. It will likely explain the issues
with the additional IO.

Joerg