Re: WAPBL patch for testing

[Joerg Sonnenberger <joerg%britannica.bec.de@localhost>]

On Sat, Nov 01, 2008 at 10:36:12AM +0100, Juergen Hannken-Illjes wrote:
> > For snapshots, the real problem is that the strategy of
> > fss doesn't handle WAPBL as it should.
> 
> And how should fss handle wapbl?

It should know by itself if it has to initiate a transaction or not
because it is called from within or just via VOP_PUTPAGE. Given that fss
is a reliable way to crash the machine anyway as soon as trying to
remove the snapshot, I'm not sure I care about it right now.

Joerg