Current-Users archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: WAPBL patch for testing

On Sat, Nov 01, 2008 at 10:36:12AM +0100, Juergen Hannken-Illjes wrote:
> > For snapshots, the real problem is that the strategy of
> > fss doesn't handle WAPBL as it should.
> And how should fss handle wapbl?

It should know by itself if it has to initiate a transaction or not
because it is called from within or just via VOP_PUTPAGE. Given that fss
is a reliable way to crash the machine anyway as soon as trying to
remove the snapshot, I'm not sure I care about it right now.


Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index