Re: build.sh vs. LD_RUN_PATH

[Hubert Feyrer <hubert%feyrer.de@localhost>]

On Wed, 24 Sep 2008, Eric Haszlakiewicz wrote:
> If it wasn't so easy to accidentally do that, I'd agree, but since "::"
> is considered to mean ".", I have a bit of sympathy with the cause of
> trying to do something to avoid problems.

Actually, it wasn't a "." but a trailing ":" here:

        % echo $LD_RUN_PATH
        /soft/lib:/usr/X11R6/lib:/soft/X11R6/lib:/usr/openwin/lib:


 - Hubert