[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: build.sh vs. LD_RUN_PATH
On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 11:20:00AM +0200, Hubert Feyrer wrote:
> I've had some fun finding out why build.sh failed in src/lib/libz when
> crossbuilding from Linux. The failure was because the tools lint picked
> up the NetBSD libz.so in the obj dir instead of the system libz.so. This
> in turn was because I had set LD_RUN_PATH to something that included "."
> when the tools lint was linked. Which leads me to the question:
Honestly, putting "." into LD_RUN_PATH strikes me as deserve-to-lose
behavior that we shouldn't change anything to "support". Do you run with
"." in root's path, too?
Main Index |
Thread Index |