[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
proposal 'pciide at cardbus' (Re: satalink at cardbus)
From: KIYOHARA Takashi <kiyohara%kk.iij4u.or.jp@localhost>
Date: Wed, 06 Aug 2008 01:53:39 +0900 (JST)
> I wrote the satalink_cardbus and the pciide_cardbus layer.
> Current pciide depends to pci. I added some members to struct pciide_softc.
> And member cardbus_chip_map added to struct pciide_product_desc.
I put newer patch.
First, current pciide(4)s (ex. satalink, viaide) is depends on pci.
However, we know SATA can be connected externally. It means 'pciide at
cardbus' is in a word necessary.
We are timing in which it thinks about the structure of pciide now.
I think the following two methods.
1. The variables for cardbus is added to pciide_softc.
2. Split pciide_pci/pciide_cardbus. pciide_pci_softc and
pciide_cardbus_softc including pciide_softc are made.
I made the patch of the former. The latter might be better. However, I
think that it is very serious to do this correction.
Main Index |
Thread Index |