Re: Is setitimer broken under current?

[Sverre Froyen <sverre%viewmark.com@localhost>]

On Thursday 07 August 2008, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 07, 2008 at 02:44:49PM -0600, Sverre Froyen wrote:
> > Sources from 1 July are OK, sources from 18 July exhibit the problem
> > (i386). I'll do some triangulation...
>
> Try before and after revision 1.149 of kern_time.c.

The problem is introduced by the commit:

http://mail-index.netbsd.org/source-changes/2008/07/15/msg207834.html

kernels before this commit are OK, those after have a broken setitimer.

Sverre