[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: Is setitimer broken under current?
On Thursday 07 August 2008, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 07, 2008 at 12:39:30PM -0600, Sverre Froyen wrote:
> > Running the program under 3.1 or 4.0 produces the expected:
> > reset1 = 0 0
> > reset2 = 0 0
> > normal exit reached
> Hm. Works with my 4.99.68 AMD64 kernel.
Sources from 1 July are OK, sources from 18 July exhibit the problem (i386).
I'll do some triangulation...
Main Index |
Thread Index |