Re: Is setitimer broken under current?

[Sverre Froyen <sverre%viewmark.com@localhost>]

On Thursday 07 August 2008, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 07, 2008 at 12:39:30PM -0600, Sverre Froyen wrote:
> > Running the program under 3.1 or 4.0 produces the expected:
> >
> > reset1 = 0 0
> > reset2 = 0 0
> > normal exit reached
>
> Hm. Works with my 4.99.68 AMD64 kernel.

Sources from 1 July are OK, sources from 18 July exhibit the problem (i386).  
I'll do some triangulation...

Thanks,
Sverre