Re: More compatibility for refuse

[Greg Troxel <gdt%lexort.com@localhost>]

coypu%sdf.org@localhost writes:

> No, upstream FUSE loves having every downstream filesystem get adjusted
> whenever it decides an argument isn't useful any more.

So you are proposing to provide more compat than mainstream fuse, and we
would add a -D argument to packages that need it, on NetBSD only, and
they would continue to fail on other-than-NetBSD?

Is the problem that uptreams of useful things are dead, and this is
easier than patching them?

Sorry if I am being dense, but the big picture is missing.