Re: More compatibility for refuse

[coypu%sdf.org@localhost]

On Wed, Apr 10, 2019 at 12:23:28PM -0400, Greg Troxel wrote:
> coypu%sdf.org@localhost writes:
> 
> > On Wed, Apr 10, 2019 at 02:22:22PM +0000, Emmanuel Dreyfus wrote:
> >> On Wed, Apr 10, 2019 at 02:16:30PM +0000, coypu%sdf.org@localhost wrote:
> >> > Tell me what you think. I will commit it soon otherwise.
> >> 
> >> You know we support vnilla libfuse through libperfuse, right?
> >> 
> >> -- 
> >> Emmanuel Dreyfus
> >> manu%netbsd.org@localhost
> >
> > No.
> > If there's some alternative interface that works better, why doesn't
> > pkgsrc use it?
> 
> Works better is complicated.
> 
> libperfuse ends up with a daemon, as I understand it, and real FUSE
> user-space libraries.
> 
> It seems that having FUSE API compat in librefuse is a good thing, if it
> doesn't cause trouble.

If anything we should get rid of perfuse.