Re: Consider to switch libjpeg-turbo as default jpeg

[Greg Troxel <gdt%lexort.com@localhost>]

Robert Bagdan <kikadf.01%gmail.com@localhost> writes:

>> I see that we currently do not have packages for libjpeg-turbo (but for jpeg) for:
>>
>> earmv4
>> m68k
>> mips64eb
>> mipsel
>> sh3el
>> sparc
>>
>
> In theory:
> Because for these archs browsers aren't available, is it possible to
> keep default jpeg
> on ports where libjpeg-turbo is not available?
> Or this would be complicated?

I don't think this is or should be about "browsers".   It seems to be
about performance, and thus matters in a broader context.  But I haven't
seen benchmarks posted.